Cenizo Journal Summer 2010 | Page 22

Book Review The Enlightened Bean Café Book Review by Dwight Deal Conservation of Shared Environments: Learning from the United States and Mexico Laura Lopez-Hoffman, Emily D. McGovern, Robert G. Varady, and Karl W. Flessa, editors, University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2009) $24.95, 296 pp. Great Music Fabulous Food Reasonable Prices T Serving breakfast and lunch 6:30 a.m. – 3 p.m. 432.229.3131 201 W. O’Reilly, Presidio 100% Beef Grilled Hot Dogs Thursday–Saturday 11:30a.m.–3:00p.m. at the Big Bend Thrift Store in Alpine (5th Street at Avenue A) Skinner & Lara, P.C. Certified Public Accountants 610 E Holland Avenue Alpine, TX 79830 Phone (432) 837-5861 Fax (432) 837-5516 • • • 22 his book is about ecology and the most important animal in the desert: man. It is about people, politics and the land along the border of the United States and Mex ico. The ecological setting was there before man, but mans needs, aspirations and actions – both deliberate and accidental – drive changes occurring today. The stated aim of this book is to pro vide citizens and leaders in Mex - ico and the United States with a blue- print to work together to conserve their shared species, ecosystems and ecosystem services. This ambitious goal has resulted in a fact-filled com- pendium from 46 auth ors. Un avoid ably there is uneven coverage of topics and a wide variation in styles of writing which can be distracting, but this is not a novel. It is filled with facts and history and is an exceptional reference work for those trying to understanding the complex story of water and land management and the ecological changes occur ring along our southern border. Without this historical perspective, today’s conflicts are impos- sible to understand. I was both surprised and gratified to learn about the many, often personal, efforts that have been made in the last 30 years which attempt to resolve conflicts and focus on improving the eco- logical wholesomeness of the region. These tasks are not easy and remain daunting, if not seeming- ly impossible. Most readers are likely already members of the choir. But as a unique reference work, I know of no equal to this book. A great value of this book is clearly pointing out the many players and the many conflicts. It focuses more on the Sonoran Desert of Arizona and California, but our own Big Bend receives significant mention. Humans have utilized and altered existing ecosystems for at least 10,000 years. Defor est - ation occurred; grasslands were converted to agri- culture; streams were diverted and minerals mined. Native American Indian tribes remain players who are involved and concerned. Europeans, lead by the Spanish, introduced new concepts and management practices in the late 16th century. They brought implements for construction, agriculture, irrigation and mining that profoundly modified the land. Environ - mental changes were already evident by the 18th century. These changes accelerated with the 1884 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the 1853 Cenizo Third Quarter 2010 Gadsen Purchase, which established the present bound ary line and brought additional conflict between Spanish and English legal and man- agement systems. Water-ownership and allocation regimes have driven economic change. In the western United States, surface and groundwater were allo- cated according to the doctrine of “prior appropriation.” In Mexico, in contrast, water rights were federally held and allocated to institutions, companies and individuals. These two modes of water ownership complicated the transition from Spanish and Mexican legal systems to the U.S. one. Dam building further complicated the issues with the construction of Boulder and Hoover Dams on the Colorado River, Elephant Butte (1916) on the Rio Grande and its sister dam, La Boquilla (1916), on the Rio Conchos. Institutions reshaping the landscape and eco - systems that dealt explicitly with natural and water resources arose late in the 19th century and near- ly all were associated with governments. The most prominent was the Interna tional Boundary Com - mission, established by the Convention of 1889. The role, scope and responsibilities of this com- mission were redefined by the Water Treaty of 1944, which renamed it the Inter na tional Water and Boundary Commission (IWBC). Until 1983, the IWBC, although narrowly focused on water resources, remained the only truly binational federal institution with a stake in the environment. Legislation in both countries created a number of agencies charged with man- aging agriculture, forestry, mining and fisheries. However, as both countries sought to populate and exploit their border regions, few of these agencies saw land or water stewardship as priori- ties. In 1983 the La Paz Agreement set up bina- tional task forces on water and air pollution, nat- ural resources and habitat, solid waste and cross- border transportation of hazardous materials. The task forces included representatives of the environmental ministries and the region’s 10 state governments as well as the diplomatic corps. Although the La Paz Agreement has remained the bedrock of official U.S.-Mexico environmen- tal co op eration, it has been politicized and mod- ified considerably. The chief criticism is that plans have lacked needed financial resources. NAFTA was adopted in 1993 and spawned two environmental offspring. One was the Com -